![]() ![]() The current dilemma with the party is the role of the Mises Caucus and how the other wings of the party have responded to their rising. Still, the vitriol in the comment can be felt making it worth analyzing what damage characters like Hazel do the Libertarian Party as a whole. Ironically, that was one of the lesser offensive comments that was made. His recent comment regarding the passing of Donald Rumsfeld read out “to hell” with the former Cabinet member. ![]() I thought that his comment was fairly distasteful as would any observer watching a political contest descend into the worst of competitive politics. However, Shane Hazel has broken that objective-based vision for the party in favor of directly acting in the worst excesses of the Libertarian Party, making harmful statements that could be misconstrued or turned against the party.īack when Perdue lost, Hazel openly called the tears of the Republican partisans “delicious”, a mockery of their political loss and frustration over it. Instead, the third-party candidates offer a broad and vague victory congratulations for their competition and stress the need for more than two options in the modern American political system. While other Libertarians have caused unpopular Republicans to lose election in Republican states like Kentucky back in the 2019 gubernatorial election, the particular demeanor of Libertarian candidates has usually shied away from directly mocking their opposition. When David Perdue lost his Senate race in 2020 to Jon Ossoff, the man who enabled the contest to advance to the ill-fated run-off was a little-known Libertarian by the name of Shane Hazel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |